Facebook no script

Nissan Magnite vs Suzuki Fronx vs Renault Kiger: Which one has the lowest running costs?

Join us as we compare the running costs of a newly introduced Nissan Magnite variant with two key rivals.

Buying a Car2 min read

Nissan's best-selling passenger car in the local market, the Magnite, showcases the shift towards affordable crossovers, but how will it compare with two similarly priced rivals, namely the Suzuki Fronx and the Renault Kiger. All three models feature petrol engines and automatic gearboxes. The question today is, which has the lowest running costs?

Related: Nissan Magnite colours and price guide

The figures

 

 

Nissan Magnite 1.0 Turbo Acenta Kuro auto

Suzuki Fronx 1.5 GLX auto

 

Renault Kiger 1.0 Turbo Intens auto

Engine size

3-cyl, 1.0-litre turbo petrol

4-cyl, 1.5-litre petrol 

3-cyl, 1.0-litre turbo petrol

Power/Torque

74 kW/152Nm

77 kW/138 Nm

74 kW/160 Nm

Gearbox

CVT

4-speed auto

CVT

Seats

5

5

5

Airbags

2

6

4

Kerb weight

1 095kg

1 015kg

1 060kg

Boot capacity

336-litres

304-605-1009-litres

405-879-litres

Fuel capacity

40-litres

37-litres

40-litres

Claimed consumption*

6.0 L/100 km

5.7 L/100 km

5.4 L/100 km

Service plan

3-yr/30 000km 

4-yr /60 000km

2-yr/30 000km

Price

R351 800

R344 900

R359 999

 *Claimed fuel consumption 

Comparing the trio

Purchase price

The models we have chosen for this comparison are competitors from a pricing and body-style perspective, with petrol engines and automatic gearboxes. Monthly instalments are calculated throughout 72 months with a 10% deposit and no balloon or residual. The interest rate is set at 12%.

Nissan Magnite 1.0 Turbo Acenta Kuro auto

The Magnite will work out at R6 190 monthly with the instalment parameters over 72 months.

Suzuki Fronx 1.5 GLX auto

With the instalment parameters, the Fronx will work out at R6 069 monthly over 72 months.

Renault Kiger 1.0 Turbo Intens auto

The Kiger will work out at R6 334 monthly with the instalment parameters over 72 months.

Fuel consumption

Our contenders all feature petrol engines. However, the Nissan and Renault feature the same 1.0-litre turbocharged petrol engine with a CVT. The Suzuki features a naturally aspirated petrol engine and a 4-speed automatic gearbox.

Service plans

Our trio have service plans; however, each product has a different duration, with Suzuki's being best at 4-year/60 000km, followed by the Nissan at 3-year/30 000km and then the Renault with a 2-year/30 000km plan.

Verdict

Looking at the data, we feel that the Suzuki Fronx will have the lowest running costs in the first five years of ownership thanks to its frugal powertrain and superior service plan. 

Author - Sean Nurse

Written by Sean Nurse

With a lifelong passion for cars, bikes, and motorsport, Sean knew that attaining a degree in journalism would allow him to pursue his passion, which was to be a motoring journalist. After graduating in 2012, Sean was awarded a bursary from the SAGMJ which allowed him to work for a variety of motoring publications. This was a dream come true for Sean, and after a year of gaining vital industry experience, he was hired as a motoring journalist at a local newspaper and worked his way up to editor. In 2020, Sean joined the AutoTrader team and counts himself lucky to wake up and genuinely love what he does for a living.Read more

More categories

All
Automotive News
Buying a Car
Car Ownership
Selling a Car
Electric Cars
Buyer's Guide