The big four ruled the roost in the double-cab segment for many years. When Chinese manufacturers entered the utility vehicle segment, Toyota, Ford, Isuzu, and Nissan dominated the market until the last few years. Over the last decade, these Chinese manufacturers have picked away at the lead of the big four, offering powerful, quality bakkies at affordable prices. These practical machines have swayed many brand devotees, but which of the new breed of vehicles will eventually save you the most month to month?
Related: What it really costs to own an LDV T60 in South Africa
Three of the best new entrants have been making their presence known, but determining the absolute lowest running costs for the LDV T60, GWM P-300 (or P-Series), and JAC T9 is complex, as it depends on the availability of parts, dealership labour costs, insurance, and long-term reliability. Based on available data, notably claimed fuel economy and included service/warranty plans, here is our comparison.
GWM P300 vs JAC T9 vs Mahindra Pik Up vs LDV T60: The alternatives compared
Comparison of key running cost factors
| JAC T9 (2.0CTI D/C 4WD Super Lux) | GWM P300 (2.4TD D-CAB LT 4x4) | LDV T60 (2.0D Bi-Turbo D/C Max Pro 4x4) | |
| Claimed Fuel Economy | 7.8 L/100km | 8.0 L/100km | 9.2 L/100km |
| Warranty | 5-year / 200 000 km | 7-year / 200 000 km | 5-year / 200 000 km |
| Service Plan | 5-year / 100 000 km | 7-year / 75 000 km | 5-year / 100 000 km |
| Service Interval |
Analysis
Fuel Efficiency
The JAC T9 has the lowest claimed combined fuel consumption, giving it a theoretical advantage in day-to-day fuel costs, a significant component of overall running costs. The GWM P-300 is a close second, while the LDV T60 is notably higher with its bi-turbo model.
Warranty & Service
The GWM P-300 has the most extensive package with a 7-year / 200 000 km warranty and a 7-year / 75 000 km service plan. This provides superior protection against unforeseen significant repair costs and covers servicing for the longest time. However, its service plan only covers up to 75 000 km
, which may be less than others.
The JAC T9 and LDV T60 offer a 5-year service plan, covering more distance than the GWM P-300's plan.
The GWM P-300's longer warranty significantly mitigates long-term risk and potentially lowers unexpected running costs.
Maintenance Intervals
The LDV T60 and GWM P-300 have the industry-standard service interval, which is slightly more convenient than the JAC T9's first service
. However, the JAC T9 also switches to
intervals after the first service.
Verdict
Based solely on the available specifications, the JAC T9 is the most efficient option with the lowest daily fuel costs. The GWM P-300 offers the longest and most comprehensive warranty for the best protection against long-term, unexpected repair costs.
The JAC T9 would likely have the lowest running costs if you prioritise fuel economy. If you prioritise long-term peace of mind and protection against major mechanical failure, the GWM P-300 is the stronger choice. The LDV T60, with its higher claimed fuel consumption, appears to have the highest running costs of the three in this comparison.
