When it comes to budget-friendly cars in South Africa, Suzuki offers two compelling options: the Celerio and the S-Presso. While both models share the identical K10C DualJet engine and target cost-conscious buyers, we did a deep dive into their official specifications, which revealed distinct differences in design philosophy, features, and capabilities.
The Suzuki Celerio is a more spacious, practical hatchback with superior boot space and fuel capacity. At the same time, the Suzuki S-Presso focuses on compactness, higher ground clearance, and has a more rugged demeanour. Suzukis are built in India, where the roads don't look too good either!
Dimensions & practical space
Taking along your friends often, or is it just you and your dog? Let's look at space!
Chad reviews the Celerio in this video.
| Specification | Suzuki Celerio | Suzuki S-Presso | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 3,695mm | 3,565mm | Celerio (+130mm) |
| Width | 1,655mm | 1,520mm | Celerio (+135mm) |
| Height | 1,555mm | 1,565mm | S-Presso (+10mm) |
| Boot Space | 295 litres | 239 litres | Celerio (+56L) |
| Fuel Tank | 32 litres | 27 litres | Celerio (+5L) |
| Ground Clearance | 170mm | 180mm | S-Presso (+10mm) |
| Turning Radius | 4.7m | 4.5m | S-Presso (-0.2m) |
| Kerb Weight | 805-830kg | 750-770kg | S-Presso (-55-60kg) |
Sizable differences:
- The Celerio offers significantly more practical space (23.4% larger boot, 18.5% larger fuel tank)
- The S-Presso is slightly more manoeuvrable (tighter turning radius, lighter weight)
- The S-Presso has better ground clearance for South African road conditions
Performance
In this segment, performance is mostly a little 'meh', but because these two cars are so light, they're friskier than they appear on paper.
| Specification | Suzuki Celerio | Suzuki S-Presso | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine | 1.0L K10C DualJet | 1.0L K10C DualJet | none |
| Power | 49kW @ 5,500 rpm | 49kW @ 5,500 rpm | none |
| Torque | 89Nm @ 3,500 rpm | 89Nm @ 3,500 rpm | none |
| Transmission | 5-Speed MT/AMT | 5-Speed MT/AMT | none |
| Technology | DualJet, VVT, Stop-Start | DualJet, Stop-Start | none |
What the numbers mean:
- Both vehicles use the identical K10C DualJet engine with the same power and torque
- Both feature Stop-Start technology and advanced fuel injection, but using the stop-start functionality isn't recommended by many mechanics.
- Performance differences come purely from weight and aerodynamics, not engine specifications
- No mechanical advantage for either vehicle: choice is about packaging and features
Buying used? This 2018 Celerio review will tell you all you need to know.
Pricing
Suzuki Celerio:
- 1.0 GA Manual: R188,900 (basic trim)
- 1.0 GL Manual: R210,900 (mid-level trim)
- 1.0 GL AMT: R225,900 (automated manual transmission: we don't like it)
Suzuki S-Presso:
- 1.0 GL Manual: R178,900 (entry-level)
- 1.0 GL AMT: R192,900 (entry auto)
- 1.0 GL+ Manual: R189,900 (mid-level)
- 1.0 GL+ AMT: R203,900 (AMT is not recommended)
- 1.0 S-Edition Manual: R205,900 (top manual)
- 1.0 S-Edition AMT: R219,900 (Avoid the AMT.)
Watch our S-Presso video review here!
Money talks:
- Comparable models price difference: R21,000-22,000 (Celerio GL vs S-Presso GL+)
- S-Presso offers more variant choice across different price points
- Entry-level advantage goes to S-Presso
Buying used? Check out our 2020 S-Presso review
Tech comparison
We all love a touchscreen with smartphone mirroring. Let's see which models have this.
| Feature | Celerio GA | Celerio GL | S-Presso GL+ | S-Presso S-Edition |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Touchscreen | No | 7" | 7" | 9" |
| Apple CarPlay | No | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Android Auto | No | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Reverse Camera | No | Yes | No | Yes |
To sum it all up:
- Celerio GL and S-Presso GL+ have identical connectivity with 7" touchscreens
- S-Presso S-Edition offers the largest 9" touchscreen in the range
- All models across both ranges include Bluetooth connectivity
Feature comparison
Comparable mid-level models:
Celerio 1.0 GL (R210,900) vs S-Presso 1.0 GL+ (R189,900)
| Feature | Celerio GL | S-Presso GL+ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheels | 15" alloy | 14" alloy | Celerio |
| Tyres | 175/60R15 | 165/70R14 | Celerio |
| Electric Windows | Front + rear | Front only | Celerio |
| Door Mirrors | Electric adjust | Manual adjust | Celerio |
| Fog Lamps | Front | None | Celerio |
| Rear Seats | 60:40 split fold | Fixed | Celerio |
| Rearview Camera | Yes | No | Celerio |
| Touchscreen | 7" with CarPlay/Android Auto | 7" with CarPlay/Android Auto | Equal |
| Price | R210,900 | R189,900 | S-Presso (-R21,000) |
Safety & security (all variants)
Safety is paramount in a small car.
Both vehicles offer identical safety equipment across all variants:
- ABS with EBD function
- Brake Assist
- ESP (Electronic Stability Programme)
- Dual front airbags
- ISOFIX child seat anchors (x2)
- Engine immobiliser
- Hill Hold Assistance (AMT models)
Safety Result: Both meet identical modern safety standards.
Which is best for whom?
Tough decision? It doesn't need to be.
Choose the Suzuki Celerio if you:
- Prioritise practical space (23.4% larger boot, 18.5% larger fuel tank)
- Want premium comfort features (electric windows front/rear, electric mirrors, fog lamps)
- Need flexible cargo space (60:40 split-folding rear seats)
- Value larger wheels and tyres (15" alloy wheels vs 14")
- Prefer rear-view camera (standard on GL)
- Take longer trips regularly (better fuel range)
Choose the Suzuki S-Presso if you:
- Have budget constraints (R21,000 less for GL+ vs Celerio GL)
- Primarily drive in cities (tighter turning radius, lighter weight)
- Navigate rough roads regularly (180mm ground clearance vs 170mm)
- Want the largest touchscreen option (9" available on S-Edition)
- Prefer compact dimensions for parking and manoeuvrability
- Like more variant choice (6 variants vs 3)
Fuel efficiency and running costs
The upside to owning such a small, light vehicle, is that it costs you very little to keep going!
Official consumption:
- Celerio AMT: 4.2L/100km (most efficient)
- S-Presso AMT: 4.4L/100km
- S-Presso Manual: 4.6L/100km
Range:
- Celerio AMT: around 762km range per tank (32L capacity)
- S-Presso AMT: around 614km range per tank (27L capacity)
The Celerio provides 24% more range between fuel stops, making it better for long-distance driving.
Space & comfort winner: Suzuki Celerio
Best for: Families, frequent travellers, comfort-focused buyers
- Superior practical space and fuel range
- More premium comfort features
- Better fuel efficiency in the AMT model (but the efficiency gap isn't that big, so rather stick with manual)
- Enhanced long-term versatility
Value & compactness winner: Suzuki S-Presso
Best for: City drivers, budget-conscious buyers
- R21,000 savings on comparable model
- Better city manoeuvrability
- Higher ground clearance for potholed roads
- Largest touchscreen option available (9")
Since both vehicles share the identical K10C DualJet engine, performance is equal. The choice comes down to space versus value and comfort versus compactness.
The Celerio justifies its R21,000-22,000 premium with significantly more practical space and premium features, making it ideal for growing families or frequent travellers.
The S-Presso excels as a budget-conscious city car with modern connectivity options and superior manoeuvrability in urban environments.
Both are good choices. Your decision should be based on lifestyle needs rather than engine performance, as the mechanical foundation is identical.