New vs used Jeep Compass: What are the top three differences?
The new Jeep Compass was quietly introduced to the local market towards the end of 2018. Today we take a look at 3 key differences between a new and used Compass.
The Jeep Compass was first introduced back in 2007 with the popular first-generation models receiving a dramatic mid-life makeover in 2011. For the purposes of today’s comparison, we will be taking a look at 3 key differences between a used first-generation Compass (MK49) facelift and the current generation MP/552 version currently on sale in South Africa.
1. Model range and engines
When the updated first-generation Jeep Compass arrived locally in 2011, the line-up was restricted to a single model with two transmission options. The previous generation is only available in the brand’s ‘Limited’ specification and with a 2.0-litre naturally aspirated engine that develops 115 kW and 190 N.m. This motor was paired with either a five-speed manual gearbox or a CVT. This resulted in a claimed fuel consumption figure of 7.6 L/100km for the manual derivative and a braked towing capacity of 1 200kg.
At the time of writing the only new Compass priced in South Africa was the 2.4 4x4 Trailhawk guise. Its engine displaces 2.4-litres and produces 129 kW and 229 N.m of torque. The solitary gearbox option is a 9-speed automatic from gearbox masters ZF. This engine and gearbox combination is said to return a combined fuel consumption figure of 9.5 L/100km while providing a braked towing capacity of 1 000kg.
Related: New vs Used: Jeep Wrangler JL vs JK. What are the key differences?
2. Capability
Since the latest Compass is only sold in 4x4 Trailhawk guise locally, the brand has shown a clear change in the target audience for this specific product when we consider that the previous model was only sold in the Limited trim with a 4x2 drivetrain. While not useless when heading off-road, the previous generation Compass models sold locally are certainly better suited to road driving with the occasional; dirt road thrown in here and there.
Wearing a Trailhawk badge makes the current Compass “Trail Rated Tough.” which means that it has been tested to withstand various off-road conditions and challenges. The Trailhawk is fitted with the brand’s Selec-Terrain System which allows the user to choose a driving mode based on the type of environment they are driving through. The vehicle also features Jeep Active Drive and Active Drive Low, allowing the user to switch between two, four and four-wheel drive low modes.
3. Improved safety technology
As with all new cars, the new Compass is more technologically advanced than the vehicle it replaces. From safety and assistance systems perspective the new Compass range comes with Forward Collision Warning-Plus and Lane Sense Departure Warning-Plus as well as 6 airbags which helped earn the range a 5-star EuroNCAP safety rating. The product scored 90% for adult occupant safety, 83% for child occupant safety, 64% for pedestrian safety and 59% for its safety systems.
When we have a look at a 2012 crash test by EuroNCAP carried-out on the previous generation model we see a massive difference with that product achieving a dismal 2-star rating. It received 61% for adult occupant safety, 76% for child occupant safety, 23% for pedestrian safety and 43% for its safety assist systems.
Conclusion
Having looked at the differences between a new and used Jeep Compass it is apparent that the brand’s current Compass offering caters for a different buyer than its predecessor. The product is seemingly aimed at someone who cannot afford a larger Jeep model but still want a high degree of off-road capability. The previous Compass model appears to have been targeted at consumers who enjoy the Jeep brand and the Compass' mini-Grand Cherokee styling but are not too interested in heading off the beaten path. It is interesting to note that the previous generation model, by virtue of its smaller engine, is more efficient than the new product. Its better efficiency and obvious price advantage are the only areas where the previous model trumps the newcomer. A comparison between the two seems unfair to both vehicles, however, there is no denying that the new product is superior in most areas, as is to be expected.