Facebook no script

Honda Elevate vs Toyota Urban Cruiser vs Kia Sonet: Which one has the lowest running costs?

Honda's new Elevate is incredibly important for the Japanese brand. When buying a compact crossover, running costs are critical, so let's compare the Elevate with two key rivals.

Buying a Car2 min read

Honda has entered the compact crossover fray with its Elevate. Still, with rivals such as the Toyota Urban Cruiser and the Kia Sonet to consider, the newcomer has its work cutout! All three products mentioned feature 1.5-litre petrol engines and manual gearboxes. The question today is, which has the lowest running costs?

Related: Honda Elevate vs Toyota Urban Cruiser vs Kia Sonet: Here's our winner

The figures





Honda Elevate 1.5 Comfort



Toyota Urban Cruiser 1.5 XR manual




Kia Sonet 1.5 LX

Engine size

4-cyl, 1.5-litre petrol

4-cyl, 1.5-litre petrol 

4-cyl, 1.5-litre petrol

Power/Torque

89 kW/145Nm

77 kW/138 Nm

85 kW/144 Nm

Gearbox

6-speed manual

5-speed manual

6-speed manual

Seats

5

5

5

Airbags

2

6

2

Kerb weight

1 216kg

1 165kg

1 145kg

Boot capacity

458-litres

353-litres

392-litres

Fuel capacity

40-litres

45-litres

45-litres

Claimed consumption*

6.7 L/100 km

6.1 L/100 km

7.0 L/100 km

Service plan

4-yr/60 000km 

4-service /60 000km

4-yr/60 000km

Price

R369 900

R359 700

R360 995

 *Claimed fuel consumption 

Comparing the trio

Purchase price

The models we have chosen for this comparison are competitors from a pricing and body-style perspective, with petrol engines and manual gearboxes. Monthly instalments are calculated throughout 72 months with a 10% deposit and no balloon or residual. The interest rate is set at 12%.

Honda Elevate 1.5 Comfort

The Elevate will work out at R6 508 monthly with the instalment parameters over 72 months.

Toyota Urban Cruiser 1.5 XR manual

With the instalment parameters, the Urban Cruiser will work out at R6 329 monthly over 72 months.

Kia Sonet 1.5 LX

The Sonet will work out at R6 352 monthly with the instalment parameters over 72 months.

Fuel consumption

Our contenders all feature 1.5-litre naturally aspirated petrol engines and manual gearboxes, and in real-world driving, the trio will be similar from a fuel consumption perspective despite the Toyota being the lowest in terms of claimed fuel consumption.

Service plans

Our trio have similar service plans, with the Honda and Kia coming with 4-year/60 000km plans, while the Toyota gets a 4-service/60 000km plan, which is, in essence, the same.

Verdict

Looking at the data, we would be confident that all three of these models will cost a similar amount to run over the course of five years. Still, only one can win, and in this case, it's the Toyota Urban Cruiser, which, from our experience, has the lowest real-world fuel consumption.

Author - Sean Nurse

Written by Sean Nurse

With a lifelong passion for cars, bikes, and motorsport, Sean knew that attaining a degree in journalism would allow him to pursue his passion, which was to be a motoring journalist. After graduating in 2012, Sean was awarded a bursary from the SAGMJ which allowed him to work for a variety of motoring publications. This was a dream come true for Sean, and after a year of gaining vital industry experience, he was hired as a motoring journalist at a local newspaper and worked his way up to editor. In 2020, Sean joined the AutoTrader team and counts himself lucky to wake up and genuinely love what he does for a living.Read more

More categories

All
Automotive News
Buying a Car
Car Ownership
Selling a Car
Electric Cars
Buyer's Guide